"A right delayed is a right denied." MLK Jnr
"If we do not change our ways, then our ways do not change." G.G. (1993)
"God is Watching." - 2010 - J.J.K.Letter to the Editor - Congratulations Peter Tinley - 5.3.2010I personally congratulated Peter Tinley on his being elected as the
member for Willagee. I was one of the four candidates in the Willagee
by-election. I considered myself the best candidate however I thought
very highly of Peter as Labor's candidate. Reading Peter's maiden
speech warmed my soul - it was a meaningful and principled statement
and augurs a breath of fresh air. It intimated an outspokenness and
understanding of democratic principles long overdue. Real democracy
started and died with the Athenians and what we've had since is at best
a semblance of what the Athenians pursued. May the name Peter Tinley be
associated with the type of outspokenness, principles and change agency
that Peter's maiden speech adeptly and eloquently so captured. A
political life should be pursued by only those who understand it as a
'calling'.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Give Claire Murray a break - 4.3.2010Those who are without any sin can argue a right to throw stones. I
would like to think that those without any sin would not do this.
However most of us screw up, and quite often. We should hope in the
trust of forgiveness and in civilised support. I feel for Claire Murray
and her predicament. I am troubled by the divisive reaction to her
because of her addiction to heroin. Heroin is horrifically addictive.
It was not her drug addiction that cause the donated organ to be
rejected, however the fact of her addiction has perceptually undermined
her in society's eyes and it is not helping her cause.
Claire
Murray should be back on the waiting list in pursuit of saving her
life. The waiting list does not work in terms of an orderly queue and
rather is equivalent to a hospital triage. Those who are seriously ill
and for whom time is running out are moved up the queue.
Give
her a break, and to Kim Hames with whom I have not always seen eye to
eye, well mate, well done, your compassion on this occasion was
champion stuff.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Apologies alone are lazy - 4.3.2010Health Minister Kim Hames will apologise on behalf of the State
Government to the victims who were unlawfully and immorally separated
from their mothers who had given birth to them outside of wedlock.
Apologies are useless when we continue with similar practices. Eugenics
continue to this day as we live in an ever increasing nanny state, and
who is responsible for this - the Government.
What good is the
Apology to the Stolen Generation when children are still taken by the
under resourced and under qualified Department of Child Protection?
This terrifying Department over involves itself in people's lives and
destroys families. With the Children and Community Services Act 2004,
and especially with the vague and loose section 133, under qualified
and inexperienced Field Workers can move into any family and remove
their children. They do.
Kim
Hames and Kevin Rudd have apologised for the 'attitudes' of generations
past that allowed for unwarranted, invasive and soul destroying
intrusions. However we continue with these attitudes disregarding the
inherent love within families, disregarding the pursuit of civilised
conciliation and the plethora of support mechanisms and rather we
continue into demeaning and destroying families. I suppose in a couple
of generations some politician will apologise on behalf of our
generation's harsh and hidden attitudes rather than amending the Acts
to ensure such horrific removals do not occur and cannot be loosely
justified.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Aboriginal history in the national curriculum - 3.3.2010It
should be without any reservation that Aboriginal history and culture
are key sociological and history components of the national curriculum.
A balanced national curriculum needs to include a comprehensive
Australian Aboriginal history. Without this crucial component our
understanding of British heritage and European settlement in this
country and our national identity are hence false and tainted. Further
more the majority of citizenry, as has been the case for two centuries,
will not comprehensively understand the historical and contemporary
predicaments of our Aboriginal brothers and sisters. Consequently, we
will not be able to expeditiously move forward in socially inclusive
positive ways.
For ten years I have lobbied for compulsory
indigenous education in all studies and in the very least in all
undergraduate studies at a tertiary level. I did my high school
education during the seventies and learned only token descriptions of
our Aboriginal peoples. It was only through personal experiences during
the course of the ensuing two decades and my own research into our
Aboriginal peoples that I learned much of the real truth, and the
reasons for the abject poverty that many live within.
At
Murdoch University (Perth), where I was on its Academic Council for 4 years,
and on its Senate for 3 years, I lobbied heavily for the introduction
of a tailor made unit in Aboriginal history and culture to all
undergraduate students. This would have been an Australia first. On
April 16th, 2008 I tabled the motion at our Academic Council, and it
was unfortunately defeated. Ultimately on that day, a foreshadowed
motion I tabled was upheld. We agreed that by 2010 we would introduce
some Aboriginal history and culture to be compulsorily provided in our
introductory unit to all undergraduate students. It was a beginning,
though not what I was looking for.
It
is racist and discriminatory and self-serving and most certainly not
academic to not ensure context. It is an insult to our identity
formations, to our free-thinking and to our national consciousness. For
two centuries our Aboriginal brothers and sisters lived in Apartheid.
We will only free ourselves and them when we ensure a balanced
education that can deliver consciousness raising.
It is
political childishness for shadow education minister Pyne to refer to
the inclusion of real Aboriginal history as a 'black armband view of
history'. It is also scare mongering to believe that the inclusion of
this history will unbalance and overwhelm the curriculum. Its inclusion
will enrich perspectives which will proliferate into our psyches and
procure appropriate engagement with one another.
I have lobbied
to state and federal governments the introduction of such education
within the then 'state' and national curricula since 2007. Following
the 'Apology' this is actually the 'Apology's' next real step.
Education is powerful imperative of form and content, of who we are and
how we go about things.
As
I described to Murdoch University, I have also described to our
parliamentarians and educators that the inclusion of such education is
imperative and long overdue and that it will achieve long term cost
benefits by improving lives, however we must ensure that the inclusion
of Aboriginal history and education is clearly well constructed with
the purpose of imparting true knowledge. We must ensure that the
teachers and lecturers who shall impart this knowledge are well versed
in this history and culture, and wherever possible ensure that much of
this teaching includes or is led by Aboriginal academics, and highly
regarded members of our Aboriginal communities.
As the
national consciousness is enriched by the truth by such genuine motive
then we may find an expediency not yet known to non-Aboriginal
Australians to surge the required spending in the infrastructure that
our Aboriginal brothers and sisters were horrifically and cruelly
denied for two centuries. Let us praise and enshrine the truth.
Gerry Georgatos
MA (Social Justice), MHumanRights, BA (Australian Indigenous Studies), BA (Phil), BA (Media), G/Dip (Human Rights Education)
Coordinator of Students Without Borders
Letter to the Editor (The West Australian) - Marianne Mackay - 23.2.2010Marianne Mackay (who I know) has received quite some criticism in the Letters to the
Editor page in response to her piece on tribal punishment. Marianne
described the cultural ways and legal framework of Aboriginal peoples.
Some magistrates in their courts in this country of Australia have
actually recognised tribal punishment in terms of justifiable precedent
though it has never been accepted into legislation.
Marianne
academically described an understanding of tribal punishment so
Anglo-Celtic Australians could distinguish it from the generalisation
of violence. Many convoluted these existing and historical laws amongst
Aboriginal cultures with outright violence.
The notion of jails
are abhorrent to many people, including myself, where people are
violently incarcerated into them. More than 40% of the prison
population in WA is Aboriginal. The Aboriginal population of WA is 3%.
Most offenders in prison have only minor offences and many are merely
fine defaulters. I consider their incarceration as violence. This is
our form of disgraceful tribal punishment, you don't pay a fine because
you can't afford it however you are violently removed from your home,
family and liberty and incarcerated in an overcrowded jail. Jail is not
a place without physical violence, and in this country without a Human
Rights Bill, the rights of the incarcerated are not clearly defined.
There have been over 200 deaths in custody in thereabouts a decade.
Let
us not forget that till recently the Aboriginal people of Australia
endured the most horrific apartheid, and cruelty, dispossessed of every
conceivable right, and if they spoke up they were either beaten or
incarcerated. Let us not forget that many of them continue to live in
the horrific effects of that very cruel Apartheid.
In South Africa, the cultural ways of
the 24 million indigenous citizens now overwhelm the views of the 3
million 'whites'. In Australia the 750,000 remaining Aboriginal people
are outnumbered by the 22 million 'whites'. In the end all we need is
to admit that we are one of the most racist countries in the western
world. We often misunderstand meritocracy and opportunity and the high
quality of life that can be enjoyed in this country and deny our racist
history and identities. All we need is to admit the truth, work
together in bona fide engagement, and in unison amend the Commonwealth
Constitution and deliver a conclusive Australian Human Rights Bill.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Mr Garrett should consider stepping down and Mr Rudd apologise - 23.2.2010I am not one to tear into people for mistakes however I take on people
who do not accept responsibility. It is disgusting for Mr Garrett, and
Mr Rudd, to minimise or abrogate responsibility for their negligence in
the insulation-batts program.
I have spent a number of years
working as a General Manager and on various boards. When you decide to
play a role in managing the affairs of others you take on a
responsibility that includes duty of care, and the warrant that you
will ensure you are versed in every available detail as to ensure
propriety and due diligence.
The fact is that Mr Garrett, in
his role as the Minister, and as the primary advocate of the program,
did not read all risk management materials, did not comply with his
duty to be fully informed, and therefore was not in a position to
understand liability, standards, audit and risk. Mr Rudd is defending
him rather than accepting the fact that his Minister failed in his
duty. In my role as a General Manager I would never have accepted a
colleague making decisions and implementing practices while they had
not served their responsibility to have read all the required available
reports.
What
do the families of the victims have to say about Mr Garrett's obstinacy
and Mr Rudd's defence of him? Over one hundred thousand homes need to
be inspected. Mr Garrett should step down from his current portfolio
and Mr Rudd, as a Prime Minister, should have the honesty and common
decency to apologise directly to the families of the victims and to the
Australian population for this inexcusable impropriety and outrageous
blunder.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor (The West Australian) - Survey - 23.2.2010I appreciate the Letters to the Editor section in newspapers as it is
important to read how the readers review the news and the issues at
hand. I thought it was great that The West Australian conducted a
survey to find out what people hope for the future of our state. I was
impressed to see the amount of coverage The West Australian gave the
survey responses.
In general I agree with most of the responses,
and I hope that the responses are treated as feedback by the
politicians, legislators, planners and think tanks.
I missed the
deadline for my contributions. I've lived in this great state for 16
years and it appears here is where one day my bones will be laid to
rest. I would like to see the community feeling of this state, which in
many ways is superior to the eastern seaboard states, continue and
flourish.
WA can lead the way in
Australia with a comprehensive state Bill of Human Rights to ensure all
people remain valued members of community, in that their rights are
protected and enshrined by such equity and without fear from mob
majorities and scare-mongering. Victoria and Canberra have their own
versions of Human Rights Acts. Such a Bill if enshrined with the
appropriate intentions will assist in the building and development of
anti-corruption practices and agreed ethical underwriting. Our
management systems in this state are still a far cry from equitable
policies of social inclusion and manageable anti-corruption practices.
This is because there is no conclusive one rule for all Human Rights
Act to set public and private sector standards. My doctorate research
is in the building of anti-corruption practices, underwritten by agreed
ethical understandings, in all levels of management and in the Acts and
Bills of Parliament which oversee management standards and their audit.
If WA can educate its way to such a pursuit hence WA will be able to
set the standard for the rest of Australia.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Mr Abbott is not a psychologist! - 23.2.2010It is the old however still unworn mantra that the economy will benefit
by a 'crackdown' on welfare recipients. How about redirecting this
misguided energy and cowardice to ensuring the wealthy actually pay
their taxes, that they do not hide behind company tax, bottom of the
harbour schemes, the myriad of tax rorts and the unwarranted tax
rulings too often in their favour.
How dare Mr Abbott rehash the
welfare cheat scare-mongering? How dare he haunt his spectre on those
with disability pensions? Those on disability pensions have enough
issues to deal with, mental health or physical needs, without Mr Abbott
claiming he needs to review processes to ensure stringent criteria are
met. Does he want more people to unnecessarily suffer or slip through
the many cracks of our struggling systems?
Mr Abbott is neither a clinical psychologist nor a
psychiatrist and therefore should watch his words carefully when
referring to those who suffer, barely getting by, on welfare and
disability pensions. He should focus on the actual underwriting of the
economic systems we have in place and better understand dividends,
returns, margins, distribution of equity and productivity, employment
and under-employment rather than trying to rip off the vulnerable to
assist a paper based consolidated budget because like the rest of them
who don't understand politics as a 'calling' he is too frightened to
take on the wealthy and the actual rorters and their accountants and
lawyers.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - The Department for Child Protection destroys families - Oh God! - 19.2.2010I spend my time campaigning to remedy many poorly worded and structured
Bills and Acts of Government. Our so-called parliamentarians either
don't know how to or take their sweet time. Often we create Bills that
allow for incredible powers to under-resourced departments and
agencies, and to under-qualified employees or agents of these
departments. These people can have devastating effects on peoples lives.
One
such department is the Department for Child Protection. This department
has the horrific power to take children away from the real love their
families. Right now I am working on a ministerial paper and on urgency
motions to State Parliament to address the wrongfulness of the Act that
has over-powered DCP.
In recent weeks I have met many families who have tragic stories to
declare about how DCP has unnecessarily taken their children away or into 'protective custody'.
The
intentions of the Act are not matched by the due funds to ensure
procedural fairness, high quality and validated assessments,
appropriately qualified and experienced personnel and the necessary
education and mechanisms required for conciliation, remedy and support.
DCP destroys families rather than keeping them together. The damage
even from a short stint in foster care or placement with 'extended
family' has a devastating long lasting effect.
What are we
looking for from people when we scrutiny them in terms of their
performance as parents? What are we looking for from the poor or from
cultural groups who have different demographics and dynamics than the
predominant groups who arrogantly dictate terms?
Departments
such as the so-called Child Protection, Corrective Services, amongst
others, need to have a closer at themselves before they look into the
lives of others.
After discovering that the
Stolen Generation essentially continues, the horror stories from
families and individuals destroyed by over-eager time constrained DCP
field workers, I am making it my life's work to correct the ignorance
of the Act that allows them to cruelly inflict this untold damage on
behalf of the Government of Western Australia.
Gerry Georgatos
Please contact me with your story or for help - gerry_georgatos@yahoo.com.au (read more further down and on the website)Letter to the Editor - Hand back the Laureate, and make real change - 19.2.2010The Nobel Peace Laureate Barack Obama still hasn't closed Guantanamo.
Human rights violations continue under ex parte 'exceptions' to their
Constitution, thus undermining the imperative solidarity of the
Constitution. So if in Australia we finally legislate a Human Rights
Bill will we allow for its undermining by a capacity for 'exception'
rather than one rule of law for all?
The Nobel Peace Laureate
has increased America's spending on war. One trillion US dollars so far
has been spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Substantive funding
that could have built vast infrastructure in these countries. There are
225,000 mercenary military contractors in these countries.
This year the Nobel Peace Laureate will allow a further 250 billion in spending on the Afghanistan and Iraqi wars.
Obama's great solution for peace is to surge 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan!
The
Nobel Peace Laureate has now sanctioned the building of a nuclear
reactor in the US, the first in a while. Instead of investing in
studying fusion energy which does not have the risks of nuclear energy
and especially in terms of emissions, deposits and storage we are
moving down the nuclear pathways to replace fossil fuels. Obama is
moving with the industry influences to ensure that the USA's
petrochemical dollar, what underwrites their federal economy, is
replaced by the coming nuclear dollar. They need to have control of
nuclear energy as to export it rather than import, as they do with the
petrochemical and military industries.
When will we learn?
Certainly not in the near future. Barack should hand back his Laureate
so in the very least the Nobel Prize regains some credibility. Kevin
Rudd claims he won't go down the same atomic and nuclear pathways. I
doubt it.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - Homelessness and what the Bible really says Mr Abbott - 16.2.2010Christ noted that the 'poor will always be with us' in terms that they
are among us and that we need to address and remedy poverty and
homelessness. Christ noted this in terms of vigilance and that we must
be continually alert to the imperfections in us as individuals that can
allow for instance for other human beings to live in abject poverty.
Christ, and so do the Koran, the Dhammapada, the Pali scriptures,
suggests that at every opportunity we should help one another, that we
should understand equity in terms of being meek, honourable,
compassionate, our doors open.
The Bible, the Koran and the
Dhammapada advocate a radicalisation of identity formation from
self-regarding to other-regarding, to ensure us as socially inclusive,
into people who are humble and hence ensure there is enough of
everything to go around for everyone. They advocate the radicalisation
of the distribution of capital and liquid equity in order to ensure
sustenance, shelter and welfare.
I
have spent much of my life working with the destitute, the displaced,
the neglected and the despairing. I have spent much time with
politicians who do not understand that politics is a calling and that
most of them have failed. The homeless do not want homelessness and Mr
Abbott is wrong to think otherwise, that is that some of the homeless
make their bed and that they will always be among us. We can address
homelessness. It requires only the will to do so, and that will arrive
when politicians realise that they should only pursue politics when
they understand it as a calling before a career.
The media
journals the state of affairs of the homeless almost daily however the
media needs to step up and ask why have our politicians failed to
eliminate homelessness.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - 13.2.2010 - ACTS and BILLS that allow for abuses and horrific traumaOften Governments create Acts and Bills with incredible powers that if
abused can
become pervasively invasive in the lives of people, undermining the
very intentions of the Acts and Bills. This happens when the Government
departments created to administer the intentions of these are under
resourced and under staffed. This happens when the financing of the
future planning and the requisite organisational culture are not
substantively understood by the proponents.
When such agencies are under funded
they are most certainly employing personnel who are under-qualified.
This is a dangerous practice as this most definitely leads to the
misuse and abuse of power and therefore to unwarranted high-end trauma on people
and families.
I
am surprised by the speculation for instance to
enhance the powers of the Department of Child Protection and to bring
more people and families under their scrutiny in terms of perceived
neglect of their children. It is more important for such under-funded
and under-qualified agencies to focus on the most serious issues such
as
childhood sexual abuse, physical abuse that is evident such as where
physical harm and malnutrition can be clearly ascertained, and for
instance where pregnant mothers are serious chronic and acute drug
addicts, and to focus on addressing the disaster of homelessness. The
foci must be the serious issues and not a wide gamut.
To
step
into
the lives of families and merely bring them to standards others
have or to unrealistic aspirant ideals, for instance what the affuent
nuclear families can have, is unfair, unkind and
'dysfunctional' in the contextual terms of the rich tapestry,
culturally and
economically, that humanity induces. In terms of universality it is
unrealistic,
unachievable, destructive and it is ignorant, discriminatory and
anathema. Historically, such impetus led to the Stolen
Generation, and in general to the unnecessary traumatic removal of
children from the love of their families. This continues to this day
because of the expansive pursuit to eliminate every perceived alleged
domestic violence
description. What constitutes as domestic violence and as abuse
continues to increase as we expand the human rights vocabulary, and
therefore the domestic violence vocabulary grows, however we are not
able to afford the mechanisms and the professionals to remedy every new
perceived abuse. However we live in denial, presuming we can address
everything, and hence create Acts and Bills as if they alone will
achieve our wishfulfilments. As a result we now have over eager
under-qualified DCP
workers unnecessarily traumatising families with the briefest of
assessments, the terror of powerful accusations, the presumption of
guilt before innocence, the unnecessary onus of presuming to prevent
the hypothetical and the at-risk scenario, and with all this families
are divided, diminished and decimated.
This is happening
because of the aspirant ideal to ensure unrealistic descriptions of the
familial environment. Over zealous politicians and other proponents
should not argue for what they cannot budget for. You cannot propose
Acts and Bills that provide powers for agencies to act on behalf of the
presumed interests of others when you cannot afford to budget for the
appropriate number of suitably qualified professionals and mechanisms, including the conciliatory and remedy-driven,
that will ensure propriety in its entirety. Anything less has the
opposite effect, and hence such agencies and departments become the
problem rather than a solution.
It
is
not only DCP that should have the Acts that provide it
overwhelmingly powers that it cannot cope with, that hence become
abusive and destructive, urgently reviewed and where necessary just as
urgently revoked or limited. These same concerns are the heart of what are
wrong with the Stop and Search laws, the Move On and Curfew policies,
certain Seizure laws, Mandatory Sentencing and
Detention. When professionals, whether social workers, police officers,
and government bureaucrats, are under-qualifed for the position or
cannot be
substantively professionally developed and further trained, and when
balance
and checks and procedural fairness cannot be afforded, then we
dangerously rely on individuals whose limited education may not be able
to overwhelm personal views, time-constrained judgments, prejudices
and biases, and who because of these short-comings may tend to resort
to the short-cut of 'power' and 'confrontation'. This is how systemic
abuse manifests and the original hopes and intentions of the Acts and
Bills are hence lost.
Gerry Georgatos
Convenor for the Campaign to Eliminate Abusive Powers from Unviable Acts and Bills of Government.(To join the campaign or to include your story please contact me at gerry_georgatos@yahoo.com.au)
Letter to the Editor - 28.1.2010 - Christian Porter is wrongChristian Porter reckons that there is a lower percentage of mentally
unwell people in prisons than in the population at large. Therefore
Christian must reckon that most prisoners are just bad people with ill
intent at the heart of their personalities.
Christian must
resign as the Attorney-General and as the Minister for Corrective
Services. There are proportionately more people in prisons mentally
unwell than in the population at large, and their personality disorders
and myriad of issues are exacerbated by the lack of psycho-social and
psycho-therapeutic and psychiatric counselling.
Poverty
inhibits the recorded discovery of the mental unwellness that hurts so
many human beings, and jails are full of the poor rather than the rich.
Mental illnesses are increasing in our competitive and high expectation
merit-oriented society. If governments funded the type of assistance
people need we'd have less people getting worse, less people
re-offending, less people incarcerated. The criminal justice system
creates more criminals and does not sift out those mentally unwell
people who just need some bloody help. Christian Porter disgusts me.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - 21.1.2010 - Child Sexual Predators
Child sexual predation is up in WA to 298 offenders caught in 2009 in
comparison to 45 less during 2008. However this is the tip of the
iceberg. I estimate that there are minimally 10,000 child sexual abuse
incidents each year.
We haven't educated society to ensure the
identification of such sexual abuse, most of it intra-familial. We
haven't educated society and the families that make it up to report it.
Rather the perpetrators are protected even if it is by the shameful
hostility of denial.
We need to encourage people to stand up
and respect the victims. The effects are life-long and
inter-generational. We need the law to find ways to establish the truth
as currently only 1.6% of child sexual abuse prosecutions are
successful.
Child sexual abuse is horrific, a betrayal of
trust, the abandonment of love, a life in darkness and the morbid, the
precursor of mental breakdowns, a journey into loneliness, torment,
anger and violence, it is the breaking of the soul - and it takes so
much and so many to help put ones soul together again. Please people,
let us really rise on this one. I have.
Gerry Georgatos
Letter to the Editor - 9.1.2010 - Anger
One blow striking someone to the head can lead to their death. This
same blow will lead to someone's incarceration. Relatives, and
especially the children, will live with the lasting effects.
Comparatively,
reported threatening behaviour, assaults and domestic violence have
gone up by almost 12,000. 28,604 reported in 2009 as compared to 16,734
in 2000.
What leads to this behaviour and all its horrific
implications? How do we deal with it? Do we forever punish the
transgressors and with harsher penalties? Do we demand of them to
merely engage in the 'management' of their anger?
Obviously
various forms of trauma, much of it high-end such as childhood sexual
abuse, and high levels of betrayal of trust, abandonment by parents,
have led to these behaviours and their ever increasing rise.
Yes, we should have an expectation for people
to behave themselves, however it is a hard ask for many who have
endured unjust grievous high end trauma. Rather than merely expect one
to 'manage' their anger, which does not mean to eliminate it, we, as a
society, should invest in the type of psycho-social counselling,
psychotherapy and psychological services that assist people with anger
issues, depression, extreme mood swings and anxiety to discover the
trauma that has led to the anger, to completely understand this trauma
and therefore eliminate the anger altogether, and hence return the
natural rights of the person at stake to the pursuance of a quality
life filled with positive identity notions and self-esteem. We must
encourage the truth. We must all take responsibility. The victims are
many. Without this approach everything will continue much the same.
Gerry Georgatos
.
"God is Watching." 2010 - J.J.K.